0.03/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.11	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.11/0.32	% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
0.11/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.32	% CPULimit   : 960
0.11/0.32	% WCLimit    : 120
0.11/0.32	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 05:35:36 EDT 2022
0.11/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.17/0.43	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.17/0.43	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.17/0.44	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.17/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.17/0.44	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.17/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.44	# Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.44	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.44	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.44	# Starting new_ho_8 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.44	# post_as_ho12 with pid 14131 completed with status 0
0.17/0.44	# Result found by post_as_ho12
0.17/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.17/0.44	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.17/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.44	# No SInE strategy applied
0.17/0.44	# Search class: HHHSF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
0.17/0.44	# partial match(1): HGHSF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
0.17/0.44	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.17/0.44	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 65s (1) cores
0.17/0.44	# ehoh_best2_full_lfho with pid 14139 completed with status 0
0.17/0.44	# Result found by ehoh_best2_full_lfho
0.17/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.17/0.44	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.17/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.44	# No SInE strategy applied
0.17/0.44	# Search class: HHHSF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
0.17/0.44	# partial match(1): HGHSF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN
0.17/0.44	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.17/0.44	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 65s (1) cores
0.17/0.44	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.17/0.44	
0.17/0.44	# Proof found!
0.17/0.44	# SZS status Theorem
0.17/0.44	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.17/0.44	thf(decl_22, type, c_2: $i).
0.17/0.44	thf(decl_23, type, absval: $i > $i).
0.17/0.44	thf(decl_24, type, c0: $i).
0.17/0.44	thf(decl_25, type, c_less_: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.44	thf(decl_26, type, esk1_1: ($i > $o) > $i).
0.17/0.44	thf(cBLEDSOE_FENG_8, conjecture, ((![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((((X1)!=(absval @ X2))<=(c_less_ @ X1 @ c0)))=>?[X3:$i > $o]:(((X3 @ c_2)&![X4:$i]:(~((X3 @ (absval @ X4)))))))<=(c_less_ @ c_2 @ c0)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cBLEDSOE_FENG_8)).
0.17/0.44	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(((c_less_ @ c_2 @ c0)=>(![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((c_less_ @ X1 @ c0)=>((X1)!=(absval @ X2))))=>?[X3:$i > $o]:(((X3 @ c_2)&![X4:$i]:(~(X3 @ (absval @ X4)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cBLEDSOE_FENG_8])])).
0.17/0.44	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X9:$i, X10:$i, X11:$i > $o]:(((c_less_ @ c_2 @ c0)&((~(c_less_ @ X9 @ c0)|((X9)!=(absval @ X10)))&(~(X11 @ c_2)|(X11 @ (absval @ (esk1_1 @ X11))))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])).
0.17/0.44	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((~((c_less_ @ X1 @ c0))|((X1)!=(absval @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.44	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i > $o]:(((X3 @ (absval @ (esk1_1 @ X3)))|~((X3 @ c_2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.44	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(~((c_less_ @ (absval @ X1) @ c0))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.17/0.44	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ((absval @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(((Z0)=(c_2))))))=(c_2)), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_4])).
0.17/0.44	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (c_less_ @ c_2 @ c0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.44	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6]), c_0_7])]), ['proof']).
0.17/0.44	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.17/0.44	# Parsed axioms                        : 5
0.17/0.44	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.17/0.44	# Initial clauses                      : 7
0.17/0.44	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
0.17/0.44	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
0.17/0.44	# Processed clauses                    : 5
0.17/0.44	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.17/0.44	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.17/0.44	# ...remaining for further processing  : 5
0.17/0.44	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
0.17/0.44	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.17/0.44	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.17/0.44	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.17/0.44	# Generated clauses                    : 10
0.17/0.44	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
0.17/0.44	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.17/0.44	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.17/0.44	# Paramodulations                      : 2
0.17/0.44	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.17/0.44	# NegExts                              : 0
0.17/0.44	# Equation resolutions                 : 1
0.17/0.44	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.17/0.44	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.17/0.44	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.17/0.44	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.17/0.44	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.17/0.44	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.17/0.44	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.17/0.44	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.17/0.44	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.17/0.44	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.17/0.44	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.17/0.44	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.17/0.44	# Current number of processed clauses  : 4
0.17/0.44	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
0.17/0.44	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.17/0.44	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.17/0.44	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
0.17/0.44	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
0.17/0.44	# ...number of literals in the above   : 8
0.17/0.44	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.17/0.44	# Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.17/0.44	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.17/0.44	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.17/0.44	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.17/0.44	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.17/0.44	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.17/0.44	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.17/0.44	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.17/0.44	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.17/0.44	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.17/0.44	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 476
0.17/0.44	
0.17/0.44	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.44	# User time                : 0.002 s
0.17/0.44	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.17/0.44	# Total time               : 0.004 s
0.17/0.44	# Maximum resident set size: 1780 pages
0.17/0.44	
0.17/0.44	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.44	# User time                : 0.002 s
0.17/0.44	# System time              : 0.005 s
0.17/0.44	# Total time               : 0.007 s
0.17/0.44	# Maximum resident set size: 1768 pages
0.17/0.44	EOF